Parallel analog scales

You could use a set of analog sliders to indicate your rank order of preference, along with the strength of preference. 

This would allow for some choices to be equal or near equivalents, and for some to be way down the OMDB list. 

Example: You notice that Matilda, 84 yo, 48kg, has mistakenly received two doses of IV gentamicin this morning. Her serum creatinine is 125. Plot the following choices for effectiveness:

a) Send her to the peritoneal dialysis unit

How effective is this response?

1
100

b) Start forced fluid diuresis with IV fluids and furosemide

How effective is this response?

1
100

c) Push oral fluids and monitor urine output

How effective is this response?

1
100

d) Apologize to her, making sure to talk into her good ear

How effective is this response?

1
100

e) Call a team meeting to ensure that this is not repeated as a system error

How effective is this response?

1
100

Research is needed on how to relatively score these preferences, possibly based on the weighting used in SCT. Also the granularity of the sliding scale will make a difference. Note that in OpenLabyrinth, the step value of the slider does not have to equate to selected zones of equivalence. This can be individually tuned per question within the QUestion slider definition. 

Check out some of the other alternatives or FINISH the case. 

FINISH
Biaxial graph
Confidence Based Marking
Negatively skewed rank orders

Map: SJT Concordance (539)
Node: 15396
Score:

reset

OpenLabyrinth
OpenLabyrinth is an open source educational pathway system

Review your pathway

  • Pracujete ako pôrodná asistentka v prenatálnej poradni
  • START
  • Terajšie ochorenie
  • Recent history
  • Clinical Scenario
  • new node
  • Duelling dilemmas
  • Kontrollera A
  • Why did we do this?
  • Start
  • Výber vhodnej veľkosti laryngeálneho tubusu
  • Start
  • Name
  • Predpísať blokátor protónovej pumpy, poučiť o diétnom režime
  • Parallel analog scales

Reminder

empty_reminder_msg

FINISH

Time is up

Debbuger window